Nonverbal Communication, Body Language Expert Jan Hargrave

Can you tell when someone is lying? How can you project confidence or sincerity? What does your handshake say about you? It’s all about body language. Jan Hargrave nationally recognized body language expert revels these secrets and many more in her entertaining and informative presentation “Let Me See Your Body Talk”. Author of several books on body language and featured on some of the counties most popular television programs Jan has been teaching audiences how to read body language signals for over 15 years. Jan teaches audiences how to use body language to gain a competitive advantage is sales, business negotiations, job interviews and even romance.It’s valuable practical information that can be used everyday. “Let me see your body Talk” to book Jan for your next event, visit janhargrave.com.

How to Read Body Language : How to Tell if Someone is Lying with Body Language

Learn how to tell if someone is lying by their body language and how to read other body language in this free video on body language communication skills. Expert: Michelle Roth Bio: Dr. Michelle Roth is licensed Psychologist and relationship expert. Filmmaker: Nili Nathan

Interesting Blogs

Body language, is blinking a sign of lying?

I can’t remember but I thought one of my psych profs. said blinking was a sign of lying. Yes or no? Experts only or have a documented answer please.
couldn’t that nervousness be caused because of lying?
What aboutJohn McShame lately allhe does is blink constantly. It is not like the celebrity hungry fool has never been in the public eye. He’s always lied, but not like this. I have never seen him blinking like this either, I’ve seen him millions of times but not blinking like this when he speaks. What are other signs/gestures of lying?


Interesting Blogs

I asked a question about how most children lie when they get in trouble, how is homosexuality any different?

If children are born with a propensity for lying, does that mean God created them liars and that lying is morally ok?

If not, why is this line of reasoning used to justify homosexuality?

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtZCpmAnr8E2iqwF6EIW4G_sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090423105318AAJibMj

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtZCpmAnr8E2iqwF6EIW4G_sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090423105318AAJibMj

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtZCpmAnr8E2iqwF6EIW4G_sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090423105318AAJibMj

Calling me an idiot is a brilliant line of reasoning by the way… bravo.

Clear up misinformation on AVG?

I wanted to clear up some information flying around yahoo answers posted by the Norton, McAfee, Avast!, Avira, Bitdefender, etc… virus software fanboys. (come on people! being a fanboy of Virus software is just sad!)

Contrary to what the fanboys want you to believe, AVG does not work on file names alone. It works on virus signatures and heuristics just like every other anti virus product out there, so stop claiming that AVG falsely detects major OS components as infected, this is just a complete lie. If your AVG install IS detecting major OS components as infected then you are either using a pirated windows copy or you have gotten a serious infection.

Resource usage is actually very satisfactory compared to other offerings; especially the common ones like Norton and McAfee! Even if you compare to the other free offerings like Avira and Avast which both use roughly 80MB of system memory with "minimal" installation options, AVG free installed with minimal options still beats them out since it only uses roughly 25MB.

As for detections, they could be better. But you can’t expect it to be as good as the subscription Nod32 or Eset Smart Scan for the detections over resource usage and AVG is pretty competitivewith other free solutions in this area.

Remember, you cannot simply install an anti virus program on a Windows system and always expect it to come back 100% clean, no matter what brand you use, NO anti-malware packages can make that claim.

I will admit that now that they’ve started using pop-up ad screens like Avira, I will probably switch for the better detection rates since the only thing keeping me from switching to Avira in the first place was all their ads.

Anyway, let me know what you think.
LOL already the fanbois come out in droves!

AVG was made to detect the EICAR only in certain formats on purpose. Grisoft did want a method to recieve the file for file based tests that are also needed so they don’t detect it in every format. Every company chooses how they will detect this.. originally they detected it in most all formats but found then that people couldn’t get a copy to test other areas with.

All Eicar effectively does is show that the resident sheild is up, it does nothing to prove the effectiveness of the antivirus since all antivirus programs can easily be programmed to detect it since it is always the same string of data!
Thanks for the link to elitekiller.com for the disabling of the Avira nag screens though!
Meh, the lack or inclusion of root-kit detection doesnt bother me much.

Why?

The problem with root-kits is that once a virus injects a root-kit into your OS kernel it is next to undetectable, so if it doesn’t stop the virus it won’t detect the root-kit.

It gets even worse if you take hyper-visor root-kits into consideration.

Prove to me that this is not the case and I will change my mind.