Lie detection test of Bush?

Hey what about the Lie detection test of George Bush for 9/11 true findings?

There are probably TWO persons who 1000% knows the real truth about 9/11. They are George Bush and Osma bin Laden. Laden is hard to get for Lie detection test, but Bush is gettable if Obama, International community, UN, etc or 9/11 protesters urge or ask Legally

By the way let me tell you there are many types of Lie detection tests of which some methods are very much reliable http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_detection

Related posts:

  1. How do lie detection tests increase the quality of our every day communication?
  2. Lie Detection Audio Analysis Software for OS X?
  3. Is lie detection real career?
  4. Michael Shermer Tests the Polygraph and Lie Detection Part 1
  5. What is the 100 %legal way to prove that you are not lying without using a polygraph/lie detector?

12 Responses to Lie detection test of Bush?

  1. on_a_mission_to_please

    Don’t worry about Bush and 9/11.

    Think about this, Bush lied constantly about their being Weapons of Mass Distruction and sent out troops to die on a war based on lies! Since Joe Wilson wants to call people liars, why don’t just he just write a whole book on Bush AND his own governor from South Carolina Mark Sanford. Hypocrite.

  2. mikey

    Loonie.

  3. doinou

    Bush is not the president now. How about making an attempt to keep the President straight. He lies over and over and over. . .

  4. spock69

    Try it on Obama first…dodo bird!

  5. Ask And I Shall Answer !!

    Time to find something else to do with your time. Seriously……do you actually believe that George Bush could plan 911 all by himself?

    Are you frikkin’ nuts are just dead from the neck up?

    If you even stop to think about the logistics involved in doing something like that, any sane person without an agenda would realize how ridiculous they sound.

    Be more worried about Obama….this man you all allowed to waltz into the White House without so much as a background check.

  6. bwlobo

    One thing we all must do is grow old. Growing up is optional. I see you’ve chosen just the first option.

    The answer to your question is: "no"

  7. ghost of hung hugely

    How about sanity detection for the 911 truthers.

    Hey why not reality detection for the rabid Bush haters. Do they not realize that Bush is no longer President.

    If Obama ever decides to criminalize politics and go after Bush "legally", he will be sizing himself up for a prison jumpsuit. If he goes after Bush, the next President will come after him

    PS Hats off to your math and grammar teachers, I bet they are proud.

  8. tompainsbones

    The guy who no doubt knows the answers to your questions is Dick Cheney. Bush was kept in the dark so he could have ‘plausible denial’. On 9/11 Cheney was the one giving orders and monitoring the situation from the White House situation room. Bush was reading to kindergartners in Florida. Ben Laden was and probably still is on the CIA payroll.

  9. TANK

    Please get help for that mental condition.

    http://www.tinfoilhats.com
    for the moron that said Bush lied about WMD

    "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." – President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

    "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program." – President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

    Iraq is a long way from here, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." – Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

    "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." – Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998

    "We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." – Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D – MA), and others Oct. 9,1998

    "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." – Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

    "Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." – Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

    "There is no doubt that … Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of an illicit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." – Letter to President Bus h, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

    "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations. "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." – Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

    "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." – Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." – Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

    "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons…" – Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

    "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years … We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

    "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" – Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

    "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." – Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

    "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." – Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

    "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-if necessary-to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." – Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002

    "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation … And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction… So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real" – Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

  10. Roboron

    Left wingers would just say it was a bad test or that he was a good liar….facts won’t matter

  11. tdtcapo

    Bush would probably short the thing out…

  12. ANSH from Specialty Chemicals

    HI,
    This is great and very exciting news and i think most of the people don’t like the bush. So i think he is fail because he is not a good human being. Anyways keep it up and keep continue with your valuable thoughts!
    Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge

This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage.